Subscribe
About
  • Home
  • /
  • Wireless
  • /
  • Telcos must charge reciprocal international termination rates

Telcos must charge reciprocal international termination rates

Admire Moyo
By Admire Moyo, ITWeb news editor.
Johannesburg, 30 Mar 2022
ICASA councillor Dr Charley Lewis.
ICASA councillor Dr Charley Lewis.

Local telcos must charge reciprocal international termination rates for voice calls originating outside of South Africa.

This is according to telecoms regulator the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA), which today published its findings following the conclusion on the ongoing regulatory process for the review of the pro-competitive conditions imposed on relevant licensees in terms of the Call Termination Regulations of 2014.

In a statement, ICASA says the findings are a culmination of the consultative process the authority embarked upon through the publication of the discussion document in November 2021 – to solicit representations from all the relevant stakeholders for the purpose of reviewing the pro-competitive licensing terms and conditions imposed by the Call Termination Regulations in 2014.

Call termination rates are the fees telephony service providers pay each other to terminate voice calls made by a subscriber of one service provider to a subscriber of another service provider.

For a long time, the industry has been lamenting that call termination rates in South Africa were “anti-competitive” in that they favoured the bigger players at the expense of the smaller ones.

Others stated the authority did not appropriately assess the impact of over-the-top (OTT) services on mobile voice call termination. They argued this was because of the growing popularity and the rapidly decreasing barriers for using OTT voice services.

The players said OTT services offer better functionality (ie, video calling and multiparty calling) compared to traditional voice calls, reducing barriers to take up.

On 28 May 2021, ICASA published a questionnaire on its website and a notice of intention to review the pro-competitive conditions imposed on licensees in terms of the Call Termination Regulations.

The review was carried out in terms of section 67(8) of the Electronic Communications Act.

In its statement, the regulator says its findings in respect of the call termination process include but are not limited to the following:

  • The relevant markets are mobile and fixed termination markets (including termination of voice calls originating outside of South Africa).
  • Each individual licensee that offers wholesale voice call termination services in South Africa has 100% market share in respect of voice calls terminating on its network and has significant market power.
  • Neither retail nor wholesale constraints are likely to be effective in preventing a wholesale voice call termination services provider (mobile or fixed) from setting termination rates above competitive levels in the absence of a regulatory intervention.

The authority has determined to retain the following pro-competitive licence terms and conditions to address market failures in the relevant markets:

  • Licensees must charge cost-based pricing.
  • Licensees must publish a reference interconnection offer.

Furthermore, ICASA says mobile termination rates will move to symmetry within a transitional period of 12 months, while new licensees will qualify for asymmetry for a limited period of three years after entry into the market.

Among other matters consulted upon in the discussion document was the international termination rate, which has been a bone of contention for consumers and business for a long while.

“With regards to this matter, the findings are that local licensees must charge reciprocal international termination rates for voice calls originating outside of South Africa,” says ICASA councillor Dr Charley Lewis.

“The international termination rates charged by local licensees may not be less than the domestic regulated termination rate, or higher than the international termination rate offered by their counterpart – meaning that the difference between domestic termination rates and international termination rates must be fair and reasonable.”

The authority says it has committed to publishing a notice of intention to initiate the next phase of the process – the public consultation on cost modelling to determine the efficient cost of providing wholesale voice call termination services.

Share